Unlike Agur, son of Yakeh, whom King Solomon supposedly credited with not understanding only 4 basic truths (dealing with the vectors of a bird’s flight, snake’s slither, ship’s glide, and a man’s path to the heart of a woman), I know if there were a WQ (Wisdom Quotient) test, I would draw a blank at a hell of a lot more than 4.
While I could do with some wisdom in my ripe old age, some truths — if that’s what they are — I really don’t want to get. I am just stubborn that way.
I will be in a minority, I bet, but hey, even the Supreme Court puts out a dissenting opinion. And though I am not nearly so lofty an authority as that, I have my soapbox, and I’m not afraid to use it.
And so, to bring this matter full circle, you know one of those things I don’t get? It’s putting your pets down. I already wrote about my contempt for PETA’s sweeping euthanasia practices. And though I have received an initial response from one of PETA’s functionaries, espousing its humane methods of dealing with its rescuees, to my offer to interview its head and founder Ingrid Newkirk, to get PETA’s side of the story, so far, there has been radio silence.
But really, this isn’t even the point of this post. PETA has its own problems, and though it’s overweening intentions are probably good, touching on all of those accompanying issues — not the least its increasingly radical reputation that, even in my limited experience, makes other parties leery of doing business with this powerful non-profit — would take more than a single blog post to address. And to be honest here, more than a single blogger.
Here, all I want to talk about is our own pets — and our own individual choices. That, and the stand of every, even the most progressive constituency, on human euthanasia. Certain countries, and in the last couple of years, even a couple of states here in the US, have permitted the limited use of euthanasia. But the main and thus far uncontested caveat is that the euthanasia can only be performed if the victim has asked for it — and has retained a sufficient use of mental faculties to, if need be, prove to the courts that said procedure is being requested out of her / his free will.
I do not see our blind handicapped senile members of society being volunteered for the mortician’s services on a regular basis. Well, I don’t — with the exception of such sterling authority figures as Baroness Warnock, 84, of Britain. Duly concerned with the drain on UK’s nationalized health care put on it by its neediest recipients, the first government-connected expert to speak in favor of euthanasia, she really puts a foot in her mouth — and calls for something very similar to the Soylent Green premise — minus consuming the forcibly euthanized folks.
The senile, says the baroness, “have a duty to die”, but does not specify just how they are to acquiesce to the the procedure, limited as they are by the very condition that’s making them “eligible” for the “final solution” in Lady Warnock’s argument.
And the media, just as we journalists and bloggers like to do, is all over that — I would like to hope — slip of the tongue like white on rice. Yet that same media is keeping nicely quiet — where it is not outright supportive — on the subject of putting to sleep elderly, handicapped, or sick animals that still have a chance of leading some kind of life. And perhaps even overcoming their condition with enough dedicated medical treatment — or even simple TLC.
There is no medical insurance for pets to speak of. No good clinics. There are no high-tech machines in most cities to perform the necessary medical tests and human hospitals would never allow an animal in as a patient, the ending of one of my favorite movies, K-9, notwithstanding. There aren’t many procedures in use for pets with chronic disorders — which is ironic, because most of these life-saving techniques have been extensively tested out on our furry or snouted friends before ever crossing into the primate genus, let alone being introduced for human use.
So, what is it about the most innocent members of our society that makes them not just easy to abuse, but, also, easy to let go of under the guise of doing them a favor?
Would we really be doing a favor to our affectionate, scared, loyal, mostly healthy 17-year old furbaby Rhett by putting her to sleep because we cannot stand to see her puttering around the house walking into everything because she’s had… some kind of intercranial event, impossible to tell which without an inaccessible MRI test? Such indignity she’s been subject to! Such emotional hardship for us — and physical, too. After all, while she can sniff out the food just fine, she DOES need help finding water so that she can be kept hydrated.
How about another furbaby tearfully terminated because he lost control of his bladder and bowels, and it was ever so demeaning for him. Why, can’t have him feeling less than a man, can we?
I imagine the proprietors of nursing homes across the country going bankrupt if we spared our human relations the same indignity of disease or old age not yet correctable by science.
Yet, we do not. And the press, unless something drastically changes in our collective psyche, is, and would continue baying for blood if anyone truly pushed such an agenda forth.
Why then it is all right to “let go” of not yet comatose pets without THEIR express permission? Because, you would say, they are incapable of giving it? Since the senile of Lady Warnock’s unfortunate speech lack the same quality, are they to, also, be relegated to the same social rung? How about little babies?
Just because someone lacks the capacity of having a say, it doesn’t mean they wouldn’t want to have it if the circumstances permitted. As such, from my very own soapbox, I call for assuming a default “no” unless there is a signed living will — or a scientifically translatable meow begging the caring owner to hurry the non-human member 0f the family to his or her grave.
Related Posts -
Open Up and Let Me In - Transparency in the War on Terror Is there room for total disclosure when the stakes are this high? Is this the answer to the conflict, or merely more fuel for the fire? We need openness, communication...don't we? How are we to build a relationship -- or, for that matter, anything of value -- on lies? And...... -
It's a Sheetstorm Out There What do you do when you don't like a public defender assigned to you by our ever-merciful courts? Aren't they just like a piece of TP, stick to your shoe, and... [/caption] Sorry, what? You never had a public defender? Fine, fine, I guess feeding your own courtroom shark gives...... -
Modesty Is The Sister of Talent So, should I be? Humble, that is. Nope, not at all means I have achieved so much, I am forever tempted to hide my shining greatness behind a screen name and a pair of reflective sunglasses. The question is, do I just post -- or do I start explaining what...... -
Who you gonna call? Guinness World Records! Who hasn't heard of Guinness World Book of Records? A conversation-starter if nothing else, since its humble beginning at a May 4, 1951 shooting party attended among others by an opinionated Sir Hugh Beaver, then the managing director of Guinness Beers, it has prompted a slew of daredevils to try...... -
On the Side of the Angels! What wouldn't you to do to protect someone you love? And doesn't this, whatever it is, sometimes carry the ringing name of "justifiable homicide"? [/caption] An abused woman can kill in self-defense. A dog won't be put down for tearing out an intruder's throat and thereby saving her owner. A......
Related Websites -
Sticking with Your Resolutions Why do we make New Year's resolutions? What's the purpose? Did you even bother making any resolutions, or did you refrain due to the associated pressure and oft resulting disappointment from trying to follow said resolutions and failing? We make resolutions because we want to move forward; we want to...... -
Internet Marketing Tweets 2009-10-23 Finally got JCarousel integrated completely into my Wordpress theme. That took longer than expected. # Madoff's workplace was rife with cocaine, sex via @cnn http://bit.ly/33DIeT suprise, suprise. # Awesome video about creating a membership site that pulls in $100,000+ a month by Timothy Sykes http://vimeo.com/7140070 # Wow pretty grey...... -
Incredible SF Boater Getaways in the Bay Area In and around the Bay Area in San Francisco you will find more than 150 major parks. Every Bay Area resident can safely say that there is at least one park located within a ten mile radius of their residence. Here are some of the most unique getaway areas in...... -
President Obama Looks to Announce Target for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions With the 2009 United Nations climate meeting in Copenhagen bearing down on him, President Obama announced that the United States will propose a target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The announcement comes amidst a lack of agreement within Congress over the climate bill, which has already been passed in...... -
No One Mind They say no news is good news, and one of our two primal fears is loud noise, a.k.a. news. It is a species wide fear, but humans are supposedly creatures of knowledge and communication. Leading the normal life is a drive, but more news makes the normal life pretty dang......

















April 19th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
I agree with your rant, and wish more people could “hear” what their pets have to say, especially re whether they want to stay in the body or not.
Re this: “The senile, says the baroness, “have a duty to die” – funnily enough, Anthony Trollope proposed a fix for that in 1882, though his contemporaries were appalled at the concept of euthanizing the elderly. Interesting book.
April 19th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
Deborah, thank you for your insightful comment! Your Anthony Trollope article was an interesting read. I think there are definitely undercurrents of thought these days that may echo similar sentiments, but of course are left unsaid because of how unpopular they are by default. With an economic crisis on everyone’s mind, I suppose it is easier for these thoughts to slip out, as was the case of our aforementioned Baroness.
~Lisa